<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quake 4 First Impressions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pinkjoint.com/spongbo/69/quake-4-first-impressions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pinkjoint.com/spongbo/69/quake-4-first-impressions/</link>
	<description>the only pink is in the name, and also the colours.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 03:13:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pinkjoint &#187; The Quake 4 Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pinkjoint.com/spongbo/69/quake-4-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Pinkjoint &#187; The Quake 4 Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 14:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinkjoint.com/index.php/archives/software/games/quake-4-first-impressions/#comment-62</guid>
		<description>[...] I didn&#8217;t go into detail in the First Impressions post, but the video trailer of Quake 4 that was shown at E3 left me seriously unimpressed. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I didn&#8217;t go into detail in the First Impressions post, but the video trailer of Quake 4 that was shown at E3 left me seriously unimpressed. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gonza</title>
		<link>http://www.pinkjoint.com/spongbo/69/quake-4-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Gonza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 03:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinkjoint.com/index.php/archives/software/games/quake-4-first-impressions/#comment-61</guid>
		<description>Your link tag has been renamed, Thanks for visiting http://gonzascorner2.blogspot.com/ 

I like Q4 please don&#039;t think I&#039;m not enjoying the game, however it is not what i was expecting.

SpongBo said 
[And weapon accuracy - were we playing the same game? It was a sprayfest!]

Remember this when you play the retail version of the game! ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your link tag has been renamed, Thanks for visiting <a href="http://gonzascorner2.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://gonzascorner2.blogspot.com/</a> </p>
<p>I like Q4 please don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m not enjoying the game, however it is not what i was expecting.</p>
<p>SpongBo said<br />
[And weapon accuracy - were we playing the same game? It was a sprayfest!]</p>
<p>Remember this when you play the retail version of the game! <img src='http://www.pinkjoint.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpongBo</title>
		<link>http://www.pinkjoint.com/spongbo/69/quake-4-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>SpongBo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2005 00:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinkjoint.com/index.php/archives/software/games/quake-4-first-impressions/#comment-60</guid>
		<description>Dude, a new blog! (Housekeeping: Could you change the name of the link to &quot;pinkjoint&quot; please? Ta!)

Well... I&#039;m going to disagree on the Quake 4 front. After being quite underwhelmed, I&#039;m actually finding it a really fun romp. It&#039;s not rocket science, it&#039;s not meaningful, it&#039;s just a fun blast.

Rating so far is 8 out of 10. And I wouldn&#039;t expect the tanks or mech sequences to change you mind, they&#039;re pretty much the same as the FPS, only in a slightly different scale. I&#039;m not saying they&#039;re not fun, mind...

I&#039;m scared by F.E.A.R. To add to the list of FEAR possible deficiencies, it seemed a bit too NOLF for me, especially the &quot;briefing&quot; scene before the mission in the demo. Still, I&#039;ll probably pick it up when I&#039;m done with Quake 4 to see how it plays. The &quot;wobbly flailing legs underneath me&quot; thing was also offputting - if Starbreeze can do it right, why can&#039;t everyone?

And weapon accuracy - were we playing the same game? It was a sprayfest!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude, a new blog! (Housekeeping: Could you change the name of the link to &#8220;pinkjoint&#8221; please? Ta!)</p>
<p>Well&#8230; I&#8217;m going to disagree on the Quake 4 front. After being quite underwhelmed, I&#8217;m actually finding it a really fun romp. It&#8217;s not rocket science, it&#8217;s not meaningful, it&#8217;s just a fun blast.</p>
<p>Rating so far is 8 out of 10. And I wouldn&#8217;t expect the tanks or mech sequences to change you mind, they&#8217;re pretty much the same as the FPS, only in a slightly different scale. I&#8217;m not saying they&#8217;re not fun, mind&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m scared by F.E.A.R. To add to the list of FEAR possible deficiencies, it seemed a bit too NOLF for me, especially the &#8220;briefing&#8221; scene before the mission in the demo. Still, I&#8217;ll probably pick it up when I&#8217;m done with Quake 4 to see how it plays. The &#8220;wobbly flailing legs underneath me&#8221; thing was also offputting &#8211; if Starbreeze can do it right, why can&#8217;t everyone?</p>
<p>And weapon accuracy &#8211; were we playing the same game? It was a sprayfest!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gonza</title>
		<link>http://www.pinkjoint.com/spongbo/69/quake-4-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Gonza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 13:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinkjoint.com/index.php/archives/software/games/quake-4-first-impressions/#comment-58</guid>
		<description>I have to tell you something....... BIG MISTAKE  my Friend... big mistake. I got Both of them F.E.A.R and Quake 4 and let me tell you Quake 4 is DOOM3 with different monsters a faster weapons, nothing different.
Good Graphics but very close enviroments what is not what we are use to when we play any Quake, plus is very very lineal.

In the other hand you have the very well designed F.E.A.R where Weapons Accuracy, AI and game atmosphear are the key features of this game. The scary visions and ghost that you go throught and see during the game will make you sh@#$% your pants.
And what make this game a nice piece of entretainment is that there are different ways to achive the level objectives

I have to say so far Quake  is only 6/10 probably will change my rating after playing in open spaces or with tanks and mechrobots, F.E.A.R 9/10 and I have to say.....there is no other game like this in the market.

Gonza</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to tell you something&#8230;&#8230;. BIG MISTAKE  my Friend&#8230; big mistake. I got Both of them F.E.A.R and Quake 4 and let me tell you Quake 4 is DOOM3 with different monsters a faster weapons, nothing different.<br />
Good Graphics but very close enviroments what is not what we are use to when we play any Quake, plus is very very lineal.</p>
<p>In the other hand you have the very well designed F.E.A.R where Weapons Accuracy, AI and game atmosphear are the key features of this game. The scary visions and ghost that you go throught and see during the game will make you sh@#$% your pants.<br />
And what make this game a nice piece of entretainment is that there are different ways to achive the level objectives</p>
<p>I have to say so far Quake  is only 6/10 probably will change my rating after playing in open spaces or with tanks and mechrobots, F.E.A.R 9/10 and I have to say&#8230;..there is no other game like this in the market.</p>
<p>Gonza</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

